Every few
months, car manufacturers announce new models, with new features and more
powerful engines. What’s not to like about a 400 hp power plant? It is a
stunning piece of engineering, makes the most satisfying rumble, leaves the
competition in the dust, recalls a time of empty roads and wind-swept hair, and
says something about what you are—right?
Well, not
so fast. For years advertisers have been behind these clichés, the public has fallen
for them, a whole environment has been built around them, together with
politics, the economy, and a way of living. It’s a vicious cycle, and it’s time
to get away from it. What’s so special about squeezing the pedal to the floor,
leaving tyre marks on the road, and glaring at other drivers through tinted windows?
What’s the use of driving in spasmodic leaps between red signals? Why waste so much energy?
It's a cool street, Elm Street by Mikael. Photo: © Copenhagen CycleChic |
Why
cycling? Many good reasons, that’s why. At the risk of wagging a figurative
finger, let’s point out the health benefits that go with cycling, such as cardio-vascular
fitness, muscular flexibility, and mental acuity. Needless to say, bicycles are
cheaper than cars, emit no pollution, and require less energy to build.
You’ll like
riding a bicycle, because cyclists are a friendly group. There are no barriers
between us and the world, and we cannot retract hostility, anger, or
disappointment into a steel shell. We are still a minority, and we acknowledge
with a nod every fellow cyclist we happen upon the road. Any business with a
bike rack on the sidewalk looks welcoming. Any time we want, we stop on the
side of the road and appreciate the view, admire the sunset, or smell the
roses. If you do so in your car, a line of fellow drivers behind you will make
you aware of their gratitude.
Fall fell into Fell Street by Meligrosa. Photo: ©Bikes and the City |
Personally,
I like bikes also as objects and appreciate their essential qualities—everything
is visible, nothing is superfluous, and where the shape of components is a
consequence of the function they are destined to perform.
We live in
exciting times, when people in communities of every scale are beginning to admit
that something must be done about sedentary lives, traffic congestion, and
pollution. Politicians, quick to listen to polls but timid when it comes to
exploring unfamiliar territory, are taking notice of the shifting winds.
We have a
high regard for cities such as Amsterdam and Copenhagen, with their unhurried
pace and orderly traffic, where bicycles are the norm rather than the
exception. They seem friendlier and even more livable places than our own, its
spectacular setting and architecture notwithstanding. That they’ve become so is
no simple fluke of history; they’ve been engineered to facilitate ease of
traffic and social harmony, giving preference to cycling and pedestrian
pathways rather than the usual car and truck multi-lane highways. They weren’t
always so but have changed their ways during the past four o five decades,
adding 1 or 2 percent every year to their bicycle use.
Planners
such as Jan Gehl have visited San Francisco from Denmark, met with public
officials, and illustrated the advantages of policies that do not rely
exclusively on motor vehicles for transportation. They’ve left us wanting for
more. Even some of the members of the San Francisco Board of the Supervisors,
such as David Chiu, its chair, are in favor of increasing bicycle use. We
certainly own a debt of gratitude to non-profit organizations such as the San Francisco Bicycle Coalition or on-line publications, such as Streetsblog, for their vigorous campaigning in
favor of bicycle culture, road
safety, and number of bike paths and lanes in our streets. It is thanks to
their efforts that our longed-for San Francisco bicycle plan is being carried
out—chapeau!
Various ways to pass the time on a city square by Mikael. Photo: © Copenhagen CycleChic |
Even
bloggers are in this mix. Daily postings by Mikael in Copenhagenize.com and Cycle Chic™ or Meligrosa in Bike and the City in San
Francisco (bike equal sex, get it?) illustrate cycling in an urban context as
safe, energetic, and fun. The message is, anybody can do it, anytime. These are
ordinary people on ordinary bikes, not athletes. Retailers, such as Public Bikes,
are not far behind this populist drive.
With all
this good will, how united are we, as a society, in our appreciation of
cycling? Not very, judging from sketchy evidence. Cars, trucks, and tourist
buses—completely sealed from the outside with dark, tinted windows—still
dominate the roads. Public parks such as the Golden Gate Park and the Presidio
are intersected by so many roads—so tempting for motorists to use as a speedy
short cut—that it is difficult to find in them a place where we can feel secluded
by nature. For some drivers, a bike lane is simply an parking space.
Some object
to the presence of cyclists and express their resentment with occasional acts
of insanity, as when, a few days ago, the woman at the wheel of an SUV tried to
push me off the road. Drivers still think of cycling as exercise, something
people do in their spare time, less significant than the serious work they
perform at the wheel of their vehicle. Some see cyclists as an effete minority,
out of touch with the main stream of American society. In the minds of such
people, anything with an engine takes precedence over a bicycle.
One also questions
how far cycling has penetrated the awareness of the administrators of public
projects, who routinely place signs on bike lanes. In any infrastructure
project, they still assign priority to—you guessed it—cars, trucks, and buses.
Such is the case, for example, of The Marin Headlands and Fort Baker
Transportation Infrastructure and Management Plan, a project of modest scope,
despite the grandeur of its name, aiming at making the road wider and placing a
parking lot at the top of Conzelman Road at the Marin Headlands. Cars can drive
through roads in construction, but bikes are not permitted.
The view from the top of Conzelman Road, before its closure. |
There you
have it, there are roadblocks ahead of us. They shouldn’t deter us from
indulging in our favorite mode of transportation.
Why
cycling, indeed? Because it accomplishes so many things for us, it takes
wherever we want, at the pace we like. While riding a bicycle, we are entirely
responsible for our own actions, we must be constantly aware of our direction
as well as of the other cyclists, pedestrians, other traffic, the condition of
road in front of us, the sudden obstacles, and the puffs of wind that can
easily push us to the side. Cycling is a lot more demanding than driving but,
on the whole, requires little effort, in exchange for which it bestows a great
deal of benefits. At the end of each ride, we enjoy a minute of contentment,
not quite nirvana, yet, but a sensible alternate to the rush of time.
No comments:
Post a Comment